Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brian Gilmer, Anthony Rodgers, Deloris Wilkins v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 15, 2011

BRIAN GILMER, ANTHONY RODGERS, DELORIS WILKINS,
JERRY WILLIAMS, RAYMOND ROBBINS PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT, DEFENDANT.

employmentlaw Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610

Date Action Filed: Nov. 17, 2008

Trial Date: Not set.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO COMPLY WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAPORTE'S FEBRUARY 22, 2011 ORDER

FOSTER

The parties stipulate and Defendant AC Transit District requests that the Court issue 23 an Order extending the deadline by which Defendant Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District 24 is to provide amended responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions Nos. 28 and 34. 25

Plaintiffs do not oppose this request. 26

On February 22, 2011, Magistrate Judge Laporte entered an order requiring Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions Nos. 28 and 28 34 within 21 days of the order. Under the terms of the February 22, 2011 order, the 2 deadline for Defendant to provide said responses is March 15, 2011. On March 3, 2011, 3

Defendant filed a motion for relief from the February 22, 2011 order. That motion is 4 currently pending before Judge Wilken. 5

In light of the pending motion for relief from the February 22, 2011 order, the parties 6 stipulate, and Defendant AC Transit District requests entry of an order providing, as follows: 7

1. Defendant shall be relieved from the 21-day deadline set out in the Magistrate Judge Laporte's February 22, 2011 order;

2. If the Court issues an order denying Defendant's pending motion for relief from the February 22, 2011 order, or Defendant's motion for relief is employmentlaw deemed denied by operation of Local Rule 72-2 (if the Court neither issues a ruling on the motion or sets a briefing schedule on the motion within 14 Lakeshore Avenue days of the filing of the motion), Defendant shall have until 7 days after the motion for relief is denied or deemed denied to provide amended

FOSTER

Oakland, California 94610

responses as required by the February 22, 2011 order.

Plaintiffs do not oppose this request. There has been no prior modification to the deadline set forth in the February 22, 2011 order. 18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 11, 2011 LEONARD CARDER, LLP 20 21 /s/ Philip C. Monrad Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brian Gilmer, Anthony Rodgers, Deloris Wilkins, Jerry Williams, and Raymond Robbins

Dated: March 11, 2011 FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 25 26 /s/ Michael E. Wilbur Tammy A. Brown Attorneys for Defendant

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

IT IS SO ORDERED, this ___ day of March, 2011

ES DISTRI AT CT S T C O D U E

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE R

T T I

N United States District Judge

IT IS SO ORDERED

___________ U A

N Elizabeth D. Laporte R

O Judge O

I N R F T L H I E A RN F C D IS IC O TR T

Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610

20110315

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.