IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 15, 2011
ROBERT HAYDEN NESBITT, JR., PETITIONER,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
On February 8, 2011, petitioner filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed on January 28, 2011, denying petitioner's motion for discovery and denying petitioner leave to amend his petition to add a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed January 28, 2011, is affirmed.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.