Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lamont Williams v. C. Ferguson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 16, 2011

LAMONT WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
C. FERGUSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed January 5, 2011, the court found that plaintiff had stated cognizable claims against defendants Ballesteros, Burris, Ferguson, McCulley, Newton, and Pavilioglo and informed plaintiff that he could proceed against those defendants or file an amended complaint to attempt to state additional cognizable claims against defendants Fecht and Cowgill. The court also informed plaintiff that it would consider plaintiff's decision to proceed only against defendants Ballesteros, Burris, Ferguson, McCulley, Newton, and Pavilioglo as consent to the dismissal of his claims against defendants Fecht and Cowgill. On January 21, 2011 and February 11, 2011, plaintiff returned documents for service against defendants Ballesteros, Burris, Ferguson, McCulley, Newton, and Pavilioglo, electing not to file an amended complaint to attempt to state cognizable claims against defendants Fecht and Cowgill.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Fecht and Cowgill are dismissed without prejudice.

20110316

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.