Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Herman Miller, Inc v. Zuo Modern Contemporary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 17, 2011

HERMAN MILLER, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ZUO MODERN CONTEMPORARY, INC; STACKS AND STACKS; SPACIFY, INC.; OFFICE FURNITURE OUTLET INC.; DANRICK COMMERCE GROUP, LLC; GAOERFU FURNITURE FACTORY AND YUSHI FURNITURE CO., LTD., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR CASE SCHEDULE AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

During the continued Case Management Conference (CMC) on December 17, 2010, the Court set the trial date for October 17, 2011 (and continuing for 7-10 days). At the CMC, the Court also set October 13, 2011, as the pretrial conference date and ordered the parties to work out all other pretrial dates. Accordingly, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Herman Miller, Inc. ("Herman Miller"), Defendant/Counter-Claimant Zuo Modern Contemporary, Inc. ("Zuo"), and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Danrick Commerce Group, LLC ("Danrick") submit this Stipulation and Order for Case Schedule.

Defendants Spacify, Inc., Office Furniture Outlet, and Stacks and Stacks are no longer active participants, this Court having already entered Consent Judgments. DKTS. 28, 41, and 58, respectively. Herman Miller has dismissed Defendants Gaoerfu Furniture Factory and Yushi Furniture Co., Ltd.

Herman Miller, Zuo, and Danrick hereby stipulate and agree to the following case schedule:

(a) expert witness designations and reports on Friday, June 3, 2011;

(b) rebuttal expert witness designations and reports on Friday, July 1, 2011;

(c) non-expert and expert discovery deadline on Friday, July 22, 2011;

(d) dispositive motion filing deadline on Friday, July 29, 2011;

(e) dispositive motion hearings completed by Friday, September 2, 2011.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

A CT S C

ES DIST T RI T O D U

E R

T T U.S. District Court Jud IT ge U A

N IS SO ORDERED

I

I N N Charles R. Breyer R O Judge O R I F T H L E C A RN D OF ISTRICT

20110317

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.