Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scott E. Pombrio v. S.M. Salinas

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 17, 2011

SCOTT E. POMBRIO, PETITIONER,
v.
S.M. SALINAS, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

On March 14, 2011, petitioner filed a motion asking that this court reconsider its February 25, 2011 order dismissing this action.

A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). "Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Id. at 1263.

Petitioner does not present newly discovered evidence suggesting this matter should not be dismissed. Furthermore, the court finds that, after a de novo review of this case, the February 25, 2011 order dismissing this action is neither manifestly unjust nor clearly erroneous. There has been no change in controlling law.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's March 14, 2011 motion for reconsideration is denied.

pomb2577.mfr

20110317

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.