UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 18, 2011
OMAR FAROUK GANI
RANDY GROUNDS, WARDEN
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Present: The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge
James Munoz None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:
None Present None Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On February 23, 2011, the Court issued an Order re Petitioner's Motion to Proceed Forma Pauperis and an Order Requiring Return to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
service copies of these orders sent to petitioner have since been returned to the Court as "Return to Sender. Paroled."
Pursuant to Local Rule 41-6:
A party proceeding pro se shall keep the Court and opposing parties apprised of such party's current address and telephone number, if any. If mail directed by the Clerk to a pro se plaintiff's address of record is returned undelivered by the Postal Service, and if, within fifteen (15) days of the service date, such plaintiff fails to notify, in writing, the Court and opposing parties of said plaintiff's current address, the Court may dismiss the action with or without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Rule 41-6; see Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988).
Petitioner is ordered to show cause within fifteen (15) days of the date of this why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to inform the Court of his of address.
Failure to file a timely response to this order within the time specified will be deemed consent to the dismissal of this action.
Initials of Preparer JM
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.