UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 21, 2011
GERALD L. MILLER, JR.
O. RUFION; MOONGA, R.N.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. William McCurine, Jr. U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
EX PARTE MOTION FOR SUBPOENA [Doc. No. 96]
On November 1, 2010, the Court denied Plaintiff's ex parte motion for subpoena. [See Doc. No. 107]. The Court's November 1, 2010 Order erroneously identified Document No. 97 as the sole pleading raising Plaintiff's subpoena request, however Plaintiff's Doc. No. 96 constituted Plaintiff's opening brief while Doc. No. 97 constituted Plaintiff's reply/response in support of Doc. No. 96. The Court's November 1, 2010 Order addressed the concerns raised in Plaintiff's moving papers [Doc. No. 106] as well as in Plaintiff's Response in support of his ex parte request. Accordingly, Plaintiff's ex parte motion at Doc. No. 96 is DENIED as explained in the Court's November 1, 2010 Order at Doc. No. 107.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2014 VersusLaw Inc.