IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 21, 2011
REX CHAPPELL, PLAINTIFF,
DUC, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER & FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
By order filed December 14, 2011, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the December 14th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. On January 11, 2011, plaintiff was granted a forty-five day extension of time to file his amended complaint. The forty-five day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this case. For the reasons given in the December 14, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.