Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Xsides Corporation v. Citrix Systems

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


March 22, 2011

XSIDES CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ruby Wayne Wood

*E-Filed 3/22/11*

J. Anthony Downs (pro hac vice) jdowns@goodwinprocter.com 2 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 53 State Street 3 Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Tel.: 617.570.1000 4 Fax: 617.523.1231 5 Erica D. Wilson (SBN 161386) ewilson@goodwinprocter.com 6 Goodwin Procter LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor 7 San Francisco, California 94111-4103 Tel.: 415.733.6000 8 Fax: 415.677.9041 9 Ruby Wayne Wood (SBN 229538) rwood@goodwinprocter.com 10 Joseph R. Farris (SBN 263405) jfarris@goodwinprocter.com 11 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive 12 Menlo Park, California 94025-1105 Tel.: 650.752.3100 13 Fax: 650.853.1038 14 Attorneys for Defendant CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. 15 16

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT PRODUCTION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2(A)

By this stipulation, plaintiff xSides Corporation and defendant Citrix Systems, Inc. ("Defendant") hereby stipulate and request an order changing time to postpone the due date for Defendant's invalidity contentions and accompanying document production until April 11, 2011.

This extension of time will (1) provide the parties with additional time to negotiate the protective 5 order in this case and (2) provide Defendant the time necessary to prepare its invalidity 6 contentions and document and source code production pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4. See 7

Declaration of Ruby Wayne Wood In Support Of Order Changing Time Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-8

2(a) filed herewith. No other due dates set forth in the Court's February 4, 2011 Claim 9

Construction Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 36) are to be changed by this stipulation.

I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

Ruby Wayne Wood

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS ORDERED THAT the February 4, 2011 Claim

Construction Scheduling Order in this action is amended such that Defendant's invalidity 3 contentions and accompanying document production is due on April 11, 2011. 4 5

Dated: March __, 2011

Honorable Richard Seeborg U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20110322

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.