Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scottsdale Insur. Co v. Advent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


March 23, 2011

SCOTTSDALE INSUR. CO.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ADVENT, INC., ET AL., COMPLAINT
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge United States District Court For the Northern District of California

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

ORDER SEEKING CLARIFICATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

As set forth in the Court's March 9, 2011 Case Management Order [dkt. #104], the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint regarding Landmark American

Insurance Company ("Landmark") is March 30, 2011. The Court, however, seeks clarification as 20 to why Plaintiff seeks leave to amend the complaint to add Landmark when Plaintiff: (1) 21 previously stipulated to Landmark's dismissal from this action; and (2) represented to the Court at 22 the March 9, 2011 Case Management Conference that Plaintiff would dismiss this entire case by 23

April 29, 2011. Accordingly, by 3:00 p.m., Friday, March 25, 2011, Plaintiff's counsel shall file 24 a clarification, not to exceed three (3) pages, for these seemingly inconsistent positions. Plaintiff 25 need not continue contacting the Court and demanding an expedited hearing date. The Court will promptly provide a hearing date after considering Plaintiff's clarification.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110323

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.