Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Larry Tate v. Matthew Cate

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 23, 2011

LARRY TATE,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION (Doc. 34)

On March 22, 2011, Defendant sought leave, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), to take the deposition of Plaintiff. In addition, Defendant requested that the deposition be taken by video conferencing, if feasible.

Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant may take the deposition of Plaintiff in regard to this action while he is incarcerated in prison. Further, the deposition may be taken by video conferencing. However, nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain video conferencing equipment if it is not already available.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110323

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.