Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Winnie Huang v. Avanquest North America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 25, 2011

WINNIE HUANG,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
AVANQUEST NORTH AMERICA, INC., ET AL DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward M. Chen Judge

ORDER JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

COME NOW Plaintiff WINNIE HUANG and Defendant AVANQUEST NORTH AMERICA, INC., (collectively "the Parties") and, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, jointly stipulate to dismiss this case without prejudice. In support of their Joint כ

Stipulation of Dismissal, the Parties show as follows:

1. In her complaint, Plaintiff in this case alleged causes of action for wrongful termination in violation of the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, §§ 102(a), 104(a), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2612(a), 2614(a), and its California counterpart, the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) under California Gov't Code § 12945.2(I)(1), among other causes of action.

2. Under their respective relevant statutes, both of those causes of action only apply in cases where the aggrieved employee works at a worksite which employs at least 50 employees over a 75 mile radius.

3. Defendant has asserted that it does not employ a sufficient number of employees at Plaintiff's worksite to be covered by either the FMLA or CFRA's jurisdiction.

4. Based on Defendant's assertion, Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss those causes of action with prejudice.

5. As the application of those statutes are the only potential federal question at issue before this Court, and the remaining causes of action are all based solely on California law and more appropriately adjudicated in a California Superior Court, both parties have agreed to dismiss the current case without prejudice, and attempt to reach equitable settlement. Should such attempts fail, Plaintiffs will re-file the remaining claims in California Superior Court.

WHEREFORE, the Parties stipulate that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Jointly stipulated this 25th day of March, 2011.

Tsao-Wu, Chow & Yee LLP

BY: Roberto Ripamonti, Esq Attorney for Plaintiff, Winnie Huang Dated: March 28, 2011 Fisher & Phillips LLP IT IS SO ORDERED:

BY: IS Jennifer Achtert, Esq ES D T AT RICT C Attorney for Defendant Edward M. S T O D Chen U E R Avanquest North America, Inc. U.S. T T Magistrate N IT IS SO ORDERED I Judge U A I Case No.: 11-0753-EMC N N R F O O R I R F C N O T H E A L

20110325

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.