UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 28, 2011
DANIEL J. MASTERSON,
SILVIA HUERTA-GARCIA, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge
Mtn for Scheduling Order - Dkt. #65 Mtn to Extend Time - Dkt. #67
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion to Request Issuance of Scheduling Order and Ruling (Dkt. #65) and Plaintiff's Request for an Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Request for Extension of Time and the Court's Granting Extension of Time to Defendants (Dkt. #67). The court has reviewed the Motions.
A review of the docket in this case reflects that the court entered a Scheduling Order (Dkt. #66) on October 8, 2010. With regard to Plaintiff's Request for an Extension of Time (Dkt. #67), Plaintiff notes that the court entered an Order (Dkt. #62) allowing Defendants an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Dkt. #45). Plaintiff asserts he never received Defendants' request for an extension of time, and he wanted to oppose it. The docket reflects that the court entered an Order (Dkt. #64) granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel on September 30, 2010.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff' Motion for Scheduling Order (Dkt. #65) is DENIED AS MOOT.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension (Dkt. #67) is DENIED AS MOOT.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.