UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 29, 2011
JACIE LEE GOUDLOCK, JR.,
THOMPSON, ET ALS.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia U.S. District Judge United States District Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT THOMPSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT; AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND
[Doc. Nos. 52, 53.]
On February 1, 2008, Plaintiff Jacie Lee Goudlock, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 1.) On August 8, 2008, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 7.) On September 15, 2009, the Court issued an order adopting the report and recommendation granting Defendant Peterson's motion to dismiss without leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 34.) On October 13, 2010, the Court issued an order dismissing Defendant Cruz. (Dkt. No. 48.) On November 19, 2010, the remaining Defendant Thompson filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 52.) On December 2, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 53.) On January 28, 2011, Magistrate Judge Brooks issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendant Thompson's motion to dismiss the first amended complaint be denied as moot and Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint be granted. (Dkt. No. 59.) No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation. After having reviewed the report and recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and DENIES Defendant Thompson's motion to dismiss the first amended complaint as MOOT and GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint no later then 30 days after the date of the filing of this order. Plaintiff should note that all claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint which are not asserted in the Second Amended Complaint will be considered waived. King v. Atiyah, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.