IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
March 29, 2011
LUIS SANDOVAL, ET AL.,
AB LANDSCAPING, INC., ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge
** E-filed March 29, 2011 **
NOT FOR CITATION
United States District Court For the Northern District of California
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION TO 13 WITHDRAW [Re: Docket No. 50]
At the February 22, 2011 pretrial conference, the parties informed the Court that this 17 putative wage-and-hour class action has settled as to three of the four named plaintiffs (Luis 18 Sandoval, Israel Rodriguez, and Cesar Martinez) and the purported class members. The remaining 19 named plaintiff, Ricardo Jimenez, refuses to settle, so the parties came to no agreement as to him. 20 Jimenez's counsel, Adam Wang, represented that the relationship between him and his counsel had 21 become irreparably damaged. 22 Thereafter, Wang filed a motion for leave to withdraw as Jimenez's attorney. Docket No. 50 15 ("Motion"). The motion was served on Jimenez, and Defendants' counsel received electronic 24 notification of it through the Court's ECF system. Docket No. 50-2 ("Proof of Service"). Jimenez 25 has not filed any opposition. 26
Under this District's civil local rules, "[c]counsel may not withdraw from an action until 27 relieved by order of Court after written notice has been given reasonably in advance to the client and 28 to all other parties who have appeared in the case." Civ. L. R. 11-5(a). Moreover, "[w]hen withdrawal by an attorney from an action is not accompanied by simultaneous appearance of 2 substitute counsel or agreement of the party to appear pro se, leave to withdraw may be subject to 3 the condition that papers may continue to be served on counsel for forwarding purposes . . . , unless 4 and until the client appears by other counsel or pro se. When this condition is imposed, counsel 5 must notify the party of this condition. Any filed consent by the party to counsel's withdrawal under 6 these circumstances must include acknowledgment of this condition." Civ. L. R. 11-5(b). 7
Based on Wang's motion and declaration in support, the Court finds that the relationship 8 between Wang and Jimenez has deteriorated to the point that Wang cannot effectively represent his 9 client. Moreover, all parties - including Jimenez - received written notice of Wang's motion.
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Wang's motion for leave to withdraw.*fn1 However, since Wang makes no mention of the simultaneous appearance of substitute counsel or Jimenez's agreement to appear pro se, the withdrawal is subject to the condition that papers may continue to 13 be served on Wang for forwarding purposes unless and until Jimenez either engages new counsel or 14 agrees to represent himself pro se. Wang shall notify Jimenez of this condition. A new trial date will 15 be set upon the resolution of Jimenez's legal representation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
C09-04969 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Adam Wang email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com Adam Lee Pedersen firstname.lastname@example.org 3 Roger Mark Mason email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org 4
Notice will be provided by other means to: Ricardo Jimenez 2490 Samaria Pl. 6 San Jose, California 95111 7
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.