Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Streak Products, Inc v. Antec

March 30, 2011

STREAK PRODUCTS, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTEC, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

*E-Filed 3/30/11*

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

On March 28, 2011, this Court deemed all defense "documents not cited to, or identified and relied upon in defendant's briefs" inadmissible on the grounds of relevance. Accordingly, plaintiff's 20 administrative request to file two appendices was rendered moot and those appendices were struck 21 from the record. Plaintiff then filed a request for clarification as to whether that Order also struck a 22 declaration (the "Joyal declaration") that accompanied the appendices. In that request, plaintiff 23 explained the declaration's importance to its opposition motion and asked that the Court clarify- 24 and it does so now-that the prior Order did not strike the declaration. 25 26 27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110330

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.