The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge
This Document Relates to:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING
WHEREAS, plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") filed the above captioned lawsuit on December 6, 2010 in United States District Court, Northern District of California;
WHEREAS, Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.
("Defendants") have agreed to waive service and the parties have reached agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), to extend the time within which the Defendants must move against, answer or 6 otherwise respond to HP's Complaint;
WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 4 fixed by the Court;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, HP, on the one hand, and Defendants on the other hand, as follows:
1. Defendants will have until June 28, 2011, to move against, answer or otherwise respond to HP's Complaint.
2. Entering into this stipulation does not effect a waiver of any defense under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. This stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any challenge to 16 personal jurisdiction by either Defendant.
Fred Bartlit, Jr. Mark E. Ferguson Karma Giulianelli Lester Houtz Mark Ouweleen Bryan Leach firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 800 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 592-3100 (303) 592-3140 (Fax) Counsel for Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company By: /s/ Derek F. Foran Melvin Goldman (CA SB NO. 34097) Stephen P. Freccero (CA SB NO.131093) Derek F. Foran (CA SB NO. 224569) firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 (415) 268-7000 (415) 268-7522 (Fax) Counsel for Defendants Epson ...