Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Brockley, Tina Brockley v. Claude Mcwhorter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -SACRAMENTO


March 30, 2011

WILLIAM BROCKLEY, TINA BROCKLEY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CLAUDE MCWHORTER, DISCOVERY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

[Assigned to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. for all purposes]

On Account of the parties' willingness and intent to pursue and complete a scheduled private mediation with Judge Richard L. Gilbert on April 12, 2011 (first available date), the parties jointly seek the necessary and unavoidable further continuation of the discovery and expert related deadlines previously ordered by the Court by approximately thirty (30) days to allow for the pursuit of private mediation, and if necessary, time appropriate extensive discovery. A Further Amended Joint Status Conference Report including the proposed amended deadlines has been attached hereto as Exhibit "A".

[PROPOSED] JOINT STIPULATION SEEKING AMENDMENT OF CASE DATES AND RELATED DEADLINES; AND ORDER THEREON

The previously agreed upon time line presently controlling was premised on the ability of all parties to fully participate in the discovery process and be prepared to complete mediation in January 2011. Due to circumstances beyond the parties' control, this could not and did not occur. The granting of this Stipulation will allow for the parties to aggressively and meaningfully pursue potential resolution prior to incurring substantial costs that would otherwise greatly prejudice the prospect of informal resolution short of trial.

Based on the above, the parties jointly and respectively request the Court's approval of this PROPOSED JOINT STIPULATION SEEKING AMENDEMENT OF CASE RELATED DISCOVERY DEADLINES and the granting of the continuance of discovery expert deadlines by approximately thirty (30) days. In the alternative, the parties request the scheduling of an appropriate and first available hearing to address their concerns and the request made by way of this filing.

DATED: _________, 2011

WEINBERGER LAW FIRM

By:

Joseph B. Weinberger, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATED: _________, 2011

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD &

SMITH, LLP

By: __________________________

Charles C. Coleman, Esq. Attorney for Defendant: WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Accordingly, the Court considered the basis for the Proposed Joint Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the discovery and expert deadlines be continued by approximately thirty (30) days, as reflected by way of the parties' Further and Necessary Joint Status Conference Report.

DEAC_Signature-END:

61khh4bb

20110330

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.