Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Steven W. Rose v. State of California

March 31, 2011

STEVEN W. ROSE,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 35)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In its screening order filed October 27, 2010, the Court instructed Plaintiff to either file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified by the Court or notify the Court in writing of his willingness to proceed on his procedural due process claim. (Doc. 26.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court's order. Accordingly, on March 18, 2011, the Court issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (Doc. 35.)

On March 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 36.) Therein, Plaintiff indicates that he intended to notify the Court of his willingness to proceed on his cognizable procedural due process claim, but he accidentally filed the notice in the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California. (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff requests that the undersigned vacate the March 18, 2011 findings and recommendations so that he may proceed on his cognizable procedural due process claim. (Id.)

Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the findings and recommendations filed March 18, 2011 (Doc. 35) are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9j7khi

20110331

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.