UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 1, 2011
THE MUNIS COMPANY II, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
Docket No. 21
ORDER ON PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DATES SET BY SCHEDULING ORDER
On March 31, 2011, the parties filed a stipulated request to extend dates set by scheduling order. (Doc. 21.) The parties stated that they have conducted limited discovery and are exploring settlement. (Doc. 21, ¶3.)
The parties have stated good cause, and the Court will grant a continuance. While the Court can accommodate some of the dates proposed by the parties, some of the proposed dates do not allow sufficient time between events. Therefore, the Court has not adopted all of the dates proposed by the parties, and the schedule deadlines will be revised as follows:
Event Previous Deadline Revised Deadline
Non-Expert Discovery Deadline June 1, 2011 July 1, 2011 Expert Disclosure Deadline April 1, 2011 July 22, 2011 Supp. Expert Disclosure May 2, 2011 August 19, 2011 Deadline Expert Discovery Deadline N/A October 21, 2011 Non-Disp. Motion Filing Date June 15, 2011 November 16, 2011 Hearing for Non-Disp. Motions July 27, 2011 December 14, 2011 Disp. Motion Filing Date July 1, 2011 December 21, 2011 Hearing for Disp. Motions August 3, 2011 February 1, 2012 Pre-Trial Conference September 21, 2011 March 14, 2012 Settlement Conference June 15, 2011 June 15, 2011 Trial Date October 25, 2011 April 24, 2012 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' request for an extension of their scheduling deadlines is PARTIALLY GRANTED as set forth above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.