Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pamela Schooley and Robert Schooley, Each An Individual v. Railtown Motel; Ramesh G. Panchal; and Nita R. Panchal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 4, 2011

PAMELA SCHOOLEY AND ROBERT SCHOOLEY, EACH AN INDIVIDUAL,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
RAILTOWN MOTEL; RAMESH G. PANCHAL; AND NITA R. PANCHAL, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414) THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 4328 Redwood Hwy, Suite 300 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: 415/674-8600 Facsimile: 415/674-9900 Attorney for Plaintiffs PAMELA SCHOOLEY and ROBERT SCHOOLEY

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreement") herein, each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one original document.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release should such enforcement be necessary. This Court directs the clerk to close this action administratively.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

66h44d

20110404

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.