Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lamar Singleton v. Eli Lilly Co

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 4, 2011

LAMAR SINGLETON,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ELI LILLY CO.,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. Nos. 8, 9)

On October 27, 2010, Plaintiff LaMar Singleton ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint against Eli Lilly Co. ("Defendant"). Plaintiff claims that Defendant manufactured, marketed, and sold Zyprexa. Plaintiff asserts that taking Zyprexa caused him to develop type 2 diabetes, obesity, and permanent nerve damage and pain to both feet and hands. Plaintiff states that his claims against Defendant arise under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and requests $13,000,000 in damages.

On January 28, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint and granted Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On March 10, 2011, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations that the matter be dismissed due to Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court's January 28, 2011, order. (Doc. 8.) On March 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff asserts that he mailed an amended complaint to the Court on February 16, 2011, but it was lost in the mail. (Doc. 9, 1:11-13.) Plaintiff also asserts that, due to medical procedures, he has not been able "to concentrate on [his] legal responsibilities." (Doc. 9, 1:19.)

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS THAT:

1. The March 10, 2011, Findings and Recommendations are WITHDRAWN;

2. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before May 31, 2011; and

3. If Plaintiff again fails to file an amended complaint, the Court will recommend that the action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ie14hj

20110404

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.