UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 4, 2011
R.G. ON BEHALF OF M.G.
CLOVIS UNIFIED SHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
Motion to Augment the Record:
Filing: May 23, 2011
Hearing: June 27, 2011
Cross Motions for Summary Judgment:
Filing: October 19, 2011
Opposition: November 9, 2011
Hearing: November 28, 2011
I. Date of Scheduling Conference April 4, 2011.
III. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
Plaintiff's motion to augment the administrative record shall be filed no later than May 23, 2011 and heard on or before June 27, 2011.
Cross Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than October 19, 2011, opposition briefs shall be filed no later than November 9, 2011 and hearing on the motions shall be held on November 28, 2011, in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States District Court Judge.
IV. Settlement Conference
Should the parties desire a settlement conference, they will jointly request one of the court, and one will be arranged. In making such request, the parties are directed to notify the court as to whether or not they desire the undersigned to conduct the settlement conference or to arrange for one before another judicial officer.
V. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.
VI. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status conference.
Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested.
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.