Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Netta Grutman v. the Regents of the University of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 5, 2011

NETTA GRUTMAN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING STATUTORY DAMAGES UNDER UNRUH CIVIL RIGHTS ACT

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has included in her Complaint, at her fourth claim for relief, an allegation that defendants violated the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code sections 51 8 et seq. (UCRA), including the allegation that Plaintiff is minimally entitled to "$4,000 for each 9 incident of deterrence" in violation of the UCRA; 10

WHEREAS, Plaintiff contends that, under the UCRA, she is entitled to said minimal recovery for each and every instance in which she can demonstrate that she was denied legally 12 required equal access to the subject premises and Defendants contend that such recovery is not, as 13 a matter of law, available;

summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), (b) will aid the litigants and the

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the summary disposition of this issue shall be without prejudice to the parties' rights to seek further relief in this case under the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, specifically including a subsequent motion for summary judgment 20 and/or partial summary judgment; and

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule: (1) opening briefs shall be filed on/before April 22, 2011; and (2) response briefs shall be filed on/before May 6,

STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULTED BETWEEN PLAINTIFF NETTA GRUTMAN AND MCGREGOR AND JAMES JACOBS, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, AS

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has included in her Complaint, at her fourth claim for relief, an

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the disposition of this issue as a matter of partial Court in the efficient adjudication of this matter;

2011. The parties propose that the matter be heard on May 27, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO AGREED.

ORDER

BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND GOOD CAUSE OTHERWISE APPEARING, the Court Orders that, with respect to the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment on the 20 issue of available minimum statutory damages under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal.

Motions shall be filed on or Opposition Civ. Code § et seq., (1) opening briefs shall be filed on/before April 22, 2011; and (2) response Reply briefs shall be filed on/before May 13, 2011. briefs shall be filed on/before May 6, 2011. The matter shall be heard on May 27, 2011 at 9:30 23 a.m.

Hearing on the cross-motions will be set by the Court after completion of briefing.

IT IS SO ORDERED. T

Dated:

IT IS SO U AS MODIFIED

Joseph C. SperoA

By:

20110405

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.