Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Larry Mondragon v. Michael Martell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 6, 2011

LARRY MONDRAGON, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL MARTELL, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Fed. R.App. 24(a)(1) sets forth the requirements for applications to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal:

The party must attach an affidavit that:

(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms the party's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs;

(B) claims an entitlement to redress; and

(C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.

Fed. R. App. 24(a)(1).

Petitioner's motion adequately describes his inability to pay. However, petitioner's motion claims neither an entitlement to redress nor states the issues that petitioner intends to appeal. However, on February 28, 2011 petitioner filed a notice of appeal addressing these matters. The court takes judicial notice of the notice of appeal and finds that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is well supported.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Dkt. No. 30) is granted.

20110406

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.