Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Salvador Ramirez-Fernandez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 8, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SALVADOR RAMIREZ-FERNANDEZ, ET. AL, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424 Federal Defender MELODY M. WALCOTT, Bar #219930 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant SALVADOR RAMIREZ-FERNANDEZ

Date: April 25, 2011 Time: 9:00 A.M.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto and through their respective attorneys, that the status conference hearing in the above-captioned matter now scheduled for April 11, 2011 may be continued to April 25, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

This continuance is requested by counsel for the defendant to allow additional time for further defense preparation and to provide the parties additional time for plea negotiation prior to hearing. Assistant United States Attorney Kathleen Servatius has no objection to this request. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B). For the reasons stated above, the court finds that the ends of justice served by the delay outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9h0d30 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20110408

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.