UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 8, 2011
BARRY LOUIS LAMON, PLAINTIFF,
DERRAL ADAMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART (Doc. 84)
Barry Louis Lamon, ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983.
On February 1, 2011, a findings and recommendation issued regarding Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, and allowing Plaintiff to submit a supplemental opposition, if any, within thirty (30) days. (Doc. 84.) On February 18, 2011, Plaintiff filed his supplemental opposition. (Docs. 87, 88.) On March 1, 2011, Defendants filed objections to the findings and recommendation. (Doc. 89.) On March 9, 2011, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants' objections, a request for judicial notice, and a motion to file an addendum to his declaration in support of his supplemental opposition. (Docs. 91-93.) On March 18, 2011, Defendants were ordered to file a status report on receipt of Plaintiff's responses to Defendants' requests for admissions with which they complied on March 22, 2011. (Docs. 94, 95.) On March 23, 2011, Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii reassigned the Magistrate Judge on this case. (Doc. 96.)
In light of the Magistrate Judge reassignment and so as to consider all of the evidence and arguments submitted regarding Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 46) the findings and recommendation, issued February 1, 2011 (Doc. 84), is hereby VACATED IN PART: (1) the portion of that findings and recommendations which addressed Defendants' motion for summary judgment is VACATED; and (2) the portions of the findings and recommendation addressing Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief and ordering/allowing Plaintiff to submit a supplemental opposition *fn1 to Defendants' motion for summary judgment remain valid and intact. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed September 7, 2010 (Doc. 46) is once again deemed submitted. See Local Rule 230(l)
IT IS SO ORDERED.