Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Christopher P. Duenas, and Michael L. Schulte v. Edmund G. Brown Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 11, 2011

CHRISTOPHER P. DUENAS, AND MICHAEL L. SCHULTE,
PLAINTIFFS
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA; KAMALA D. HARRIS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA; JAMES TOWERY IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Richard Seeborg

*E-Filed 4/11/11*

JAMES M. WAGSTAFFE (95535) Email: wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com MARIA V. RADWICK (253780) Email: radwick@kerrwagstaffe.com KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 100 Spear Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105--1528 Tel: (415) 371-8500 Fax: (415) 371-0500 6 STARR BABCOCK (63473) Email: star.babcock@calbar.ca.gov LAWRENCE C. YEE (84208) Email: lawrence.yee@calbar.ca.gov MARK TORRES-GIL (91597) Email: mark.torresgil@calbar.ca.gov OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 180 Howard Stree San Francisco, CA 94105-1639 Tel: (415) 538-2012 Fax: (415) 538-232 Attorneys for Defendant JAMES TOWERY, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California

STIPULATION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON HON. RICHARD SEEBORG

By Order dated April 6, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend to file the proposed Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") attached to his reply memorandum in support of 3 his motion to amend and denied Defendants' motions to dismiss the original and proposed First 4 Amended Complaint without prejudice to their filing motions to dismiss the SAC.

Following the Court's Order, the parties met and conferred and agreed to the following schedule with regard to the SAC. April 28, 2011: Defendants' Motions to Dismiss May 12, 2011 Plaintiffs' Opposition May 19, 2011 Defendants' Reply Memoranda June 2, 2011 Hearing on Motions to Dismiss

In addition, Defendants have agreed to accept electronic service of the SAC. 12 13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110411

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.