UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 11, 2011
CHRISTOPHER P. DUENAS, AND MICHAEL L. SCHULTE,
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA; KAMALA D. HARRIS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA; JAMES TOWERY IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Richard Seeborg
JAMES M. WAGSTAFFE (95535) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org MARIA V. RADWICK (253780) Email: email@example.com KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 100 Spear Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105--1528 Tel: (415) 371-8500 Fax: (415) 371-0500 6 STARR BABCOCK (63473) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org LAWRENCE C. YEE (84208) Email: email@example.com MARK TORRES-GIL (91597) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 180 Howard Stree San Francisco, CA 94105-1639 Tel: (415) 538-2012 Fax: (415) 538-232 Attorneys for Defendant JAMES TOWERY, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California
STIPULATION RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
By Order dated April 6, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to
amend to file the
proposed Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") attached to his reply
memorandum in support of 3 his motion to amend and denied Defendants'
motions to dismiss the original and proposed First 4
Amended Complaint without prejudice to their filing motions to dismiss
Following the Court's Order, the parties met and conferred and agreed
to the following
schedule with regard to the SAC.
April 28, 2011: Defendants' Motions to Dismiss
May 12, 2011 Plaintiffs' Opposition
May 19, 2011 Defendants' Reply Memoranda
June 2, 2011 Hearing on Motions to Dismiss
In addition, Defendants have agreed to accept electronic service of the SAC. 12 13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.