Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Christopher Reed v. Michael Martel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 11, 2011

CHRISTOPHER REED, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL MARTEL, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 6, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner did not timely respond. On February 16, 2011, the court issued an order to show cause why the motion to dismiss should not be granted. On March 10, 2011, petitioner filed a response stating that he never received respondent's motion. On March 23, 2011, respondent filed a notice that he was re-serving petitioner with the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within twenty-eight days of the date of this order, and respondent's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fourteen days thereafter.

20110411

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.