IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 12, 2011
MIDEL JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,
R.J. RACKLEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On January 7, 2011, (Dkt. No. 4) plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned. By order filed March 1, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.