The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Susan J. Illston
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WHEREAS the undersigned counsel, on behalf of plaintiff Motorola, Inc. filed a Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case against LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc., (collectively, "Stipulating Defendants"), among other defendants, on July 23, 2010 ("Complaint");
WHEREAS the Court denied defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on March 28, 2011;
WHEREAS the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to answer the Complaint; and THEREFORE, Motorola, Inc. and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree:
1. The Stipulating Defendants' deadline to answer to the Second Amended Complaint will be 14 10 days from the execution of this stipulation, subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1).
By: Michael R. Lazerwitz (Pro Hac Vice) Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 974-1500 (Phone) (202) 974-1999 (Facsimile) firstname.lastname@example.org Counsel for defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. By: Jason C. Murray (State Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (State Bar. No. 220214) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 443-5573 (Phone) (213) 622-2690 (Facsimile) email@example.com Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20004 (202) 624-2500 (Phone) (202) 628-5116 (Facsimile) firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com Counsel for plaintiff Motorola, Inc.
Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has been obtained.
By: Honorable Susan J. Illston
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...