Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Louisiana Pacific Corporation v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment Dealer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


April 13, 2011

LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MONEY MARKET 1 INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT DEALER,
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE,
FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, AND DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.,
DEFENDANTS,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

Mark C. Hansen mhansen@khhte.com David L. Schwarz (206257) dschwarz@khhte.com 3 Kevin J. Miller (pro hac vice) kmiller@khhte.com 4 Andrew C. Shen (pro hac vice) ashen@khhte.com 5 KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 6 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 7 Telephone: (202) 326-7900 Facsimile: (202) 326-7999 8 R. Alexander Saveri (173102) 9 rick@saveri.com Geoffrey C. Rushing (126910) 10 grushing@saveri.com Gianna Gruenwald (228969) 11 gianna@saveri.com SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. 12 706 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5619 13 Telephone: (415) 217-6810 Facsimile: (415) 217-6813 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Louisiana Pacific Corporation

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Ctrm: 11

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

WHEREAS, on July 31, 2009, Plaintiff filed in this Court its Complaint in the above- captioned action (the "Action");

WHEREAS, on March 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed in this Court its First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the Action;

WHEREAS,on April 21, 2010, Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ("DBSI") filed a Motion To Dismiss the FAC;

WHEREAS, on March 28, 2011, this Court issued an Order granting DBSI's Motion To Dismiss with leave to amend, and stating that "[i]f Plaintiff wishes to file a second amended 9 complaint as against DBSI, it shall do so by no later than April 29, 2011"; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has conferred with DBSI and both parties have agreed that Plaintiff shall have until May 20, 2011 to file a Second Amended Complaint as against DBSI in the Action.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and DBSI, acting through their respective counsel, subject to this Court's approval, that Plaintiff shall have 15 until May 20, 2011 to file a Second Amended Complaint.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge

20110413

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.