The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable VIRGINIA A. Phillips United States District Judge
Social Security No. 1 1 1 1
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 04 11 2011
MICHAEL BELTER, CJA, Appointed
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine, in Violation of 21 U.S.C.§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii), as Charged in Count One of the Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately.
Pursuant to Guideline Section 5E1.2(a), all fines are waived as the Court finds that the defendant has established that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Juan Francisco Vaca, is hereby committed on Count 1 of the 18-Count Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 120 months.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of four years under the following terms and conditions:
1. The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
2. The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;
3. The defendant shall participate in an outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling program that includes urinalysis, breath, or sweat patch testing, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall abstain from using illicit drugs and alcohol, and abusing prescription medications during the period of supervision;
4. As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's drug and alcohol dependency to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;
5. During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
6. When not employed or excused by the Probation Officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons, the defendant shall perform 20 hours of community service per week as directed by the Probation Officer; and
7. The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The Court authorizes the Probation Office to disclose the Presentence Report to the substance abuse treatment provider to facilitate the defendant's treatment for narcotic addiction or drug dependency. Further redisclosure of the Presentence Report by the treatment provider is prohibited without the consent of the sentencing judge.
DEFENDANT INFORMED OF RIGHT TO APPEAL.
The Court RECOMMENDS that the defendant be placed at the Bureau of Prisons facility in the Southern California area, preferably, Lompoc, wherein he will be allowed to participate in the 500 Hour Residential Drug Abuse Program (RDAP), or other Southern California institution, that will allow the defendant to participate in (RDAP).
On Government's motion, the Information, filed pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851, filed on June 28, 2010, docket entry no. 541, ORDERED dismissed.
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, ...