The opinion of the court was delivered by: George H. King, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 8 2 2 3
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. April 13 2011
Y WITH COUNSEL Victor Sherman, Retained
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO NOT CONTENDERE GUILTY
There being a find/verdict of Y GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Conspiracy in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 371 as charged in Count One (1) of the Indictment; Making False Entry in Bank Report, Causing an Act to be Done in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1005, 2(b) as charged in Count Three (3) and Four (4) of the Indictment; Bribery of Bank Official in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 215(a)(1) as charged in Count Five (5) of the Indictment The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a
special assessment of $300 , which is due
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $348,750 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.
The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid as set forth in the confidential victim list attached to the Pre-Sentence
Restitution shall be paid in full immediately.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $3,000,000, consisting of the following: Count 3, a fine of $1,000,000; Count 4, a fine of $1,000,000; and Count 5, a fine of $1,000,000. The total fine shall bear interest as provided by law.
The fine shall be paid in full immediately.
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Juan Rangel, is hereby committed on Counts 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of
. This term consists of 60 months on Count 1 of the Indictment, and 87 months on Counts 3 through 5, all such terms to be served concurrently. This term of 87 months shall run concurrently to the sentence imposed by Judge Otero in case number CR 10-1061 SJO.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on
supervised release for a term of 5 years. This
term consists of 3 years on Count 1 and 5 years on each of Counts 3
through 5 of the Indictment, all such terms to run concurrently under
the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinances;
The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall participate in an outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling program that includes urinalysis, breath, and/or sweat patch testing, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall abstain from using illicit drugs and alcohol, and abusing prescription medications during the period of supervision;
As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's drug dependency to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment, fine and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall comply with the immigration rules and regulations of the United States, and if deported from this country, either voluntarily or involuntarily, not re-enter the United States illegally. The defendant is not required to report to the Probation Office while residing outside of the United States; however, within 72 hours of release from any custody or any re-entry to the United States during the period of Court-ordered supervision, the defendant shall report for instructions to the United States Probation Office, located at the United States Court House, 312 North Spring Street, Room 600, Los Angeles, California 90012;
The defendant shall not engage, as whole or partial owner, employee or otherwise, in any business involving loan programs, telemarketing activities, investment programs or any other business involving the solicitation of funds or cold-calls to customers without the express approval of the Probation Officer prior to engaging in such employment. Further, the defendant shall provide the Probation Officer with access to any and all business records, client lists and other records pertaining to the operation of any business owned, in whole or in part, by the defendant, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall not be employed in any position that requires licensing and/or certification by any local, state or federal agency without prior approval of the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant;
The defendant shall apply monies received from income tax refunds greater than $500, lottery winnings, inheritances, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation.
The Court authorizes the Probation Office to disclose the Presentence Report to the substance abuse treatment provider to facilitate the defendant's treatment for narcotic addiction or drug dependency. Further redisclosure of the Presentence Report by the treatment provider is prohibited without the consent of the court.
IT IS ORDERED that Count Two (2) of the indictment is dismissed upon the jury returning its verdict, finding the
Defendant waives his right to appeal.
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Bureau of Prisons designate defendant to a facility in the ...