Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Video Clarity, Inc v. Huaya Microelectronics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 20, 2011

VIDEO CLARITY, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
HUAYA MICROELECTRONICS, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Maria-elena James United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Video Clarity, Inc. and defendant Huaya Microelectronics, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:

1. WHEREAS all parties to this action stipulate and agree to dismiss the action with prejudice;

2. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1); and

3. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties that each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit.

Dated: April 19, 2011 ONGARO BURTT & LOUDERBACK LLP By: David R. Burtt Attorneys for Plaintiff VIDEO CLARITY, INC. Dated: April 19, 2011 JEFFREY J. CHANG & ASSOCIATES By: Rafael R. Pacquing Attorneys for Defendant HUAYA MICROELECTRONICS, INC. FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order 45, section X(B), I hereby attest that on April 15, 2011, I,David R. Burtt, received the concurrence of Rafael Pacquing in the filing of this document. David R. Burtt

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110420

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.