Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Garry Gene Graham v. Shasta County Sheriff's Department

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 21, 2011

GARRY GENE GRAHAM PLAINTIFF,
v.
SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

By order filed March 16, 2011, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and he was granted thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Although it appears from the court file that plaintiff's copy of the order was returned to the court as undeliverable, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20110421

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.