Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scott Holland v. Bp America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 21, 2011

SCOTT HOLLAND,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
BP AMERICA, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. This action was removed to this court from the Siskiyou County Superior Court on March 2, 2011. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on March 7, 2011 (Doc. 6). In response, defendant filed a motion to dismiss on March 17, 2011 (Doc. 7), which is currently set for hearing on April 28, 2011. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, any opposition "to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date." See Local Rule 230(c). The local rules further provide that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." Id.

Accordingly, and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss, scheduled for April 28, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off calendar and the matter is submitted on the record and briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110421

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.