Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Si Antitrust Litigation v. Au Optronics Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)


April 22, 2011

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) SI ANTITRUST LITIGATION STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston

KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987 HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495 KRISTIE A. BLUETT, State Bar No. 254919 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: 415.442.1000 Fax: 415.442.1001 E-mail: kroger@morganlewis.com hhoying@morganlewis.com kbluett@morganlewis.com Attorneys for Defendants HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.

[Additional moving defendants and counsel listed on signature pages]

This Document Relates To: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TIME TO No. 3:10-cv-03517-SI RESPOND IN FLORIDA ACTION

WHEREAS, on April 13, 2011, the Florida Attorney General ("Florida") filed an Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case (Dkt. No. 2652);

WHEREAS, Defendants' responses to the Amended Complaint are currently due May 2, 2011;

WHEREAS, Defendants have requested and Florida has agreed to additional time for Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint;

THEREFORE, Florida and Defendants hereby agree that:

(a) Defendants' response(s) to the Amended Complaint shall be due on May 16, 2011.

(b) Except as set forth above, all Federal and Local Rules shall remain in effect with respect to the pleadings and the briefing on motions. Entering into this stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any defense, including under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12.

(c) The parties respectfully request the Court to enter this stipulation as an order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 5/22/2011

The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

20110422

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.