(Super. Ct. No. JD228753)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Nicholson, J.
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
This is an appeal by Le.H., the father of the minor J.H., from orders terminating Le.H.'s parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395.) Appellant's contentions on appeal are limited to joining the arguments of the mother, L.H., made in her separate appeal in case No. C065750 from orders terminating her parental rights to J.H. at the same time and in the same proceeding in the juvenile court which resulted in this appeal.
The opinion in L.H.'s case, affirming the order terminating parental rights, was filed January 6, 2011, and the remittitur issued on March 8, 2011. We take judicial notice of the opinion filed in case No. C065750 and adopt the statement of facts found therein.
Appellant argues only the issues previously presented by L.H. in case No. C065750 and asserts, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 5.725(a)(2), that if L.H. was successful in achieving a reversal in her appeal, he should have the same result. Appellant suggests no basis for departing from the reasoning and result previously reached in case No. C065750 in which this court rejected L.H.'s arguments and affirmed the orders terminating her parental rights. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in case No. C065750, we affirm the juvenile court's order terminating the parental rights of Le.H.
The order terminating parental rights is affirmed.
We concur: RAYE, P. J. BUTZ, J.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...