Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rodrigo Flores v. Merced Irrigation District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 26, 2011

RODRIGO FLORES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT, A PUBLIC ENTITY,
DAN POPE, AND ROBERT BLUM,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Magistrate Judge: Dennis L. Beck

Daley & Heft, LLP Attorneys at Law Neal S. Meyers, Esq. (SBN 109625) Golnar J. Fozi, Esq. (SBN 167674) Matthew T. Racine, Esq. (SBN 256865) 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 201 Solana Beach, CA 92075 Telephone: (858) 755-5666 Facsimile: (858) 755-7870 E-mail: nmeyers@daley-heft.com gfozi@daley-heft.com mracine@daley-heft.com Lawrence D. Murray, Esq. (SBN 77536) Murray & Associates 1781 Union Street San Francisco, CA 94123 Tel: (415) 673-0555 Fax: (415) 928-4084 Dean B. Gordon, Esq. (SBN 61311) Law Offices of Dean B. Gordon 1220 East Olive Avenue Fresno, CA 93728 Tel: (559) 221-7777 Fax: (559) 221-5812 Attorneys for Plaintiff Rodrigo Flores Attorneys for Defendant Merced Irrigation District

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS Dept:

Plaintiff Rodrigo Flores and Defendant Merced Irrigation District, through undersigned 28 counsel, stipulate for entry by the Court of an order dismissing the above-captioned matter.

The parties have reached a resolution to the above-captioned matter, memorialized in a settlement agreement, with the result that plaintiff has agreed to dismiss all claims filed herein against defendant, and to have the matter dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees.

Pursuant to oral agreement of the parties on the record during the settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Dennis Beck, the Court in the person of Magistrate Judge Beck will retain jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement should any dispute regarding the settlement agreement arise between the parties.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff and defendant move the Court to approve their Joint

Stipulation Motion to Dismiss, by dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice, ordering that each party bear its own costs and fees, and retaining jurisdiction to resolve any disputes regarding enforcement of the settlement agreement.

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS

The Court, having considered the foregoing Joint Stipulation to Dismiss, filed on behalf of Plaintiff Rodrigo Flores and Defendant Merced Irrigation District, ORDERS:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of plaintiff's claims filed against defendant in the above-captioned action are dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees.

This Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purpose of enforcing the terms of the parties' settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

20110426

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.