Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lara Albertsen v. 3m Company

April 29, 2011

LARA ALBERTSEN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
3M COMPANY,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong United Stated District Court Judge

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Francis J. Ortman, III (State Bar No. 213202) fortman@seyfarth.com Robb D. McFadden (State Bar No. 258569) rmcfadden@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Brandon R. McKelvey (State Bar No. 217002) bmckelvey@seyfarth.com 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 Sacramento, California 95814-4428 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 8 Attorneys for Defendant 3M COMPANY HARRISON PATTERSON & O'CONNOR LLP James R. Patterson (State Bar No. 211102) 402 West Broadway, Suite 2900 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 756-6990 Facsimile: (619) 756-6991 JACZKO GODDARD LLP J. Christopher Jaczko (State Bar No. 149317) cjaczko@jaczkogoddard.com Allison H. Goddard (State Bar No. 211098) 4401 Eastgate Mall San Diego, California 92121 Telephone: (858) 404-9205 Facsimile: (858) 225-3500 Attorneys for Plaintiff LARA ALBERTSEN

STIPULATION OF PLAINTIFF LARA ALBERTSEN AND DEFENDANT 3M COMPANY TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2011, the Court continued the Case Management Conference in this matter pursuant to the parties' Stipulation to May 4, 2011 [Doc. No. 11];

WHEREAS, on January 21, 2011, Plaintiff Lara Albertsen ("Plaintiff") filed a First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 13];

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2011, Defendant 3M Company ("Defendant") filed an Answer to the First Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred in person on April 8, 2011 to discharge their obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and to discuss the potential of mediating this matter;
WHEREAS, the parties agree that additional time is needed to continue discussions regarding the possibility of mediation; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 16-2(e) and 7-12 the parties have stipulated to continue the Case Management Conference and reschedule it for a date that is convenient to this Court on or after June 6, 2011.

THEREFORE, the parties STIPULATE and agree as follows:

(1) That the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 4, 2011 at 3:15 p.m. be rescheduled to a date and time convenient to this Court on or after June 6, 2011; and

(2) That all Rule 26 Meet and Confer deadlines be continued and re-calendared based on the date of the rescheduled Case Management Conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and finding good cause therein, IT IS ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.