The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jacqueline H. Nguyen, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 7 0 6 2 (Last 4digits)
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER MONTH DAY YEAR
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 4 26 2011
Irwin Mark Bledstein, retained attorney (Name of Counsel)
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
Conspiracy to Commit Kidnapping, in violation of Title 18 of the United States Code Section 1201(c), as charged in Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment.
Kidnapping and Aiding and Abetting, in violation of Title 18 of the United States Code Sections 1201(a)(1) and 2, as charged in Count 2 of the First Superseding Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, IT IS THE JUDGMENT of the Court that the defendant, Suren Garibyan, is hereby committed on Counts 1 and 2 of the First Superseding Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of two hundred ten (210) months months. This term consists of 210 months on each of Counts 1 and 2 of the First Superseding Indictment, to be served concurrently.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of five (5) years under the following terms and conditions:
1. The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
2. The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;
3. During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment; and
4. The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $200, which is due immediately.
All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay.
IT IS RECOMMENDED to the Bureau of Prisons that the defendant be designated to a facility located in the ...