The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Susan Illston
Thomas P. Bleau, Esq., SBN 152945 Megan A. Childress, Esq., SBN 266926 BLEAU FOX, A P.L.C. 3575 Cahuenga Boulevard West, Suite 580 Los Angeles, California 90068 Telephone: (323) 874-8613 Facsimile: (323) 874-1234 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Transbay Auto Service, Inc. GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP 9 ROBERT C. PHELPS, Bar No. 106666 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 210-2800 Facsimile: (925) 945-1975 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER. Trial Date: May 23, 2011 Time: 8:30 a.m.
Location: Courtroom 10, 19th Floor
CHEVRONU.S.A. INC. ("Chevron"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2010, this Court continued the trial date in the above-captioned action from January 10, 2011, to May 23, 2011.
WHEREAS, the parties have already filed their pre-trial documents, including their Joint
Pretrial Conference Statement and respective Motions in Limine.
WHEREAS, on Monday April 26, 2011, Transbay learned that one of its experts, Mr.
Andrew Junius, has a scheduling conflict with the date currently set for trial, as he is getting 4 married on May 21, 2011, and will be out of the country for his honeymoon until June 6, 2011. 5
WHEREAS, Chevron's expert, Mr. LeFevers of Deloitte, is available for trial the week of June 20, 2011.
WHEREAS, Chevron does not oppose Transbay's request for continuance, given the nature of Mr. Junius' scheduling conflict. However, Chevron wishes to make clear to the Court 9 that its non-opposition to this application is without prejudice to Chevron's substantive contention 10 in its Motion in Limine No. 4 (Dkt. No. 68) that Mr. Junius should not be allowed to testify in any 11 event. Chevron assumes that the Court will rule on Chevron's objection to Mr. Junius' testimony 12 at the time the Court deems appropriate.
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The trial may be continued to June 20, 2011.
parties request a telephonic conference with the Court to discuss an ...