Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Genentech, Inc v. the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

May 2, 2011

GENENTECH, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA,
A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

ORDER REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR NON-SEALING PROFIT

The University of Pennsylvania (U Penn) has filed an Administrative Motion to Seal documents relating to its Opposition to Genentech's Motion to Amend its Complaint. U Penn's 19 request to seal the redacted portions of the Opposition, and Exhibits 2, 3 and 6 to the Haberny Declaration is granted. However, in future, U Penn should not e-file the redacted version of a 21 sealed document before the Court has granted the Administrative Motion to Seal. Instead, per

Civil Local Rule 79-5, U Penn should lodge with the Court and serve a copy of the proposed 23 redactions, and file the redacted document(s) only after the Court approves sealing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110502

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.