Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Barry Louis Lamon v. Derral Adams
May 2, 2011
BARRY LOUIS LAMON,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DERRAL ADAMS, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER FOLLOWING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE
[Docs. 38, 54, 57, 64, 78, 80, 85, 86, 89, 91, 93, 103, 104]
On April 27, 2011, at 10:30 a.m. a telephonic status conference was held in this case with Plaintiff appearing pro se and Lakeysia Beene, Esq. appearing for all served Defendants.
As discussed therein, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) the Complaint will be re-screened in light of the changed
pleading standards as delineated in Ashcroft v. Iqbal
, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009). See
Moss v. U.S. Secret Service , 572 F.3d 962 (9th
Cir. 2009) ref . Iqbal ;
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 555
(2007);
(2) within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order adopting the screening findings and recommendations, both parties may file discovery motions delineating remaining discovery sought (i.e. via compelling further responses to previously propounded discovery as well as additional discovery necessary for adequate trial preparation and/or dispositive motions) oppositions and replies may be filed in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules; *fn1
(3) all outstanding motions, as well as objections that might be construed as requests for reconsideration, are DENIED as moot per this order.