IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento)
May 3, 2011
THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
MARK NEWTON RIDDLE, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
(Super. Ct. No. 10F03369)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murray , J.
P. v .Riddle
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).*fn1 Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment.
On May 14, 2010, defendant Mark Newton Riddle was found in possession of heroin and methadone. He pled no contest to unlawful possession of heroin and methadone (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350), alcohol- or drug-related reckless driving (Veh. Code, § 23103.5), and driving while his license was suspended for driving under the influence and with a prior conviction for same (Veh. Code, § 14601.2, subd. (a)). In exchange for his plea, an additional count for being under the influence of heroin and methadone and a special allegation of a prior conviction for driving under the influence were dismissed. It was also agreed that he would not be sentenced to state prison at the outset.
The trial court ordered defendant to participate in drug court and placed him on informal probation for three years. Defendant was also ordered to serve 32 days in county jail, with credit for two days served, and to pay various fines and fees, including a $100 restitution fine.
Defendant appeals. He did not obtain a certificate of probable cause. (Pen. Code, § 1237.5.)
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: BLEASE, Acting P. J. HULL , J.