Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carmon Warren v. S. Shawnego

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 3, 2011

CARMON WARREN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
S. SHAWNEGO,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AS PREMATURE (Doc. 42)

Plaintiff Carmon Warren, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 29, 2003. This action is proceeding against Defendant Shawnego on Plaintiff's due process claim.

Subject to certain requirements set forth herein, Plaintiff is entitled to the issuance of a subpoena commanding the production of documents from a non-party, Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, and to service of the subpoena by the United States Marshal, 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). However, the Court will consider granting such a request only if the documents sought from the non-party are not equally available to Plaintiff and are not obtainable from Defendant through a request for the production of documents. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34. If Plaintiff wishes to make a request for the issuance of a records subpoena, he may file a motion requesting the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum that (1) identifies with specificity the documents sought and from whom, and (2) makes a showing in the motion that the records are only obtainable through that third party.

In this instance, discovery just opened on April 18, 2011, making it impossible for Plaintiff to have already sought the documents directly from Defendant. *fn1 Plaintiff's motion for a subpoena shall be denied. Plaintiff may renew his motion only if he is unsuccessful in obtaining the documents directly from Defendant in compliance with Rule 34 and the Court's discovery order. *fn2

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum, filed April 29, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED as premature.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.