IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2011
RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA, PLAINTIFF
ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding with appointed counsel with a civil rights action.
On January 4, 2011, counsel was appointed for plaintiff and on January 14, 2011, defendants were provided an opportunity to file a motion for summary judgment. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on February 25, 2011. On March 8, 2011, the parties filed a briefing and hearing schedule and all briefings were to be filed by May 5, 2011, and the hearing on the summary judgment motion was to occur on May 19, 2011. On May 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a request to reopen discovery for six months and to continue the summary judgment hearing at a date after the close of discovery. It is not clear why this request was not filed months ago.
As plaintiff's request was filed just a few days before the due date
for the summary judgment opposition, a date which had been chosen
several months ago by the parties,
the court construes the motion as a request to delay summary judgment
and reopen discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d)(2).*fn1
However, plaintiff's motion has failed to follow the
procedures of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d)(2), by not elaborating on the
"specific reasons" why summary judgment cannot adequately be opposed
at this time.
Plaintiff stated that he does not intend to engage in a fishing expedition, but rather seeks a narrow set of documents, depositions, interrogatories and request for admissions.*fn2
Motion at 8. However, plaintiff does not describe the narrow set of requests with enough specificity, instead generally stating that information is required regarding plaintiff's injuries, the procedures defendants followed and their state of mind.
Within ten days, plaintiff may describe in detail what discovery is needed, from which defendants, and how long it will take to obtain it. The 180 days that plaintiff has requested is far too much time. No extensions will be provided to file this briefing. If plaintiff does not file this briefing, then the opposition to summary judgment will be due in 28 days.
According, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Within ten days, plaintiff may describe in detail what discovery is needed, from which defendants and how long it will take to obtain it. No extensions will be provided. If plaintiff does not file this briefing, then the opposition to summary judgment will be due in 28 days;
2. The hearing set for May 19, 2011, is vacated.
Gregory G. Hollows