Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The People v. Carolyn Ann Winkler

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo)


May 5, 2011

THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
v.
CAROLYN ANN WINKLER, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

Super. Ct. No. CRF10-628

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Butz, J.

P. v. Winkler

CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

On February 6, 2010, Yolo County sheriff's deputies searched defendant Carolyn Ann Winkler and found numerous syringes, two of which were filled with methamphetamine.

Defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) in exchange for dismissal of the remaining counts and enhancements and a stipulated one-third the midterm or eight months consecutive to her current six-year state prison term she was serving in Solano County case Nos. FCR219447, FCR221647, FCR231898 and FCR247122. The trial court sentenced defendant accordingly.

Defendant appeals. She did not obtain a certificate of probable cause. (Pen. Code, § 1237.5.)

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: RAYE, P. J. MAURO, J.

20110505

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.