UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 6, 2011
BOSTON TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. AND RODERICK MARSHALL STIPULATION
ROBERT WOOD DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge
David C. Phillips (SBN 032611) email@example.com PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP 50 California Street, 35th Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: (415) 398-0900 Fax: (415) 398-0911 Steven M. Cowley (Pro Hac Vice) firstname.lastname@example.org Thomas H. Wintner (Pro Hac Vice) email@example.com EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE, LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, Massachusetts 02199 Tel: (617) 239-0100 10 Fax: (617) 227-4420 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Boston Telecommunications Group, Inc. and Roderick Marshall
SCHEDULE AND TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING CONTINUE HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
Date: June 3, 2011 Time: 9:00 a.m. Court: The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
A hearing on dispositive motions is to be held June 3, 2011 per the Court's civil minute 25 order (ECF No. 250 filed 3/22/2010). Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on 26 April 27, 2011 (ECF No. 262) in advance of the hearing. 27 Plaintiffs' counsel, Thomas H. Wintner, has a trial in Massachusetts State court that 28 commenced on May 2, 2011; will continue into the week of May 9; and may further continue into the week of May 16. Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with Defendant's counsel, and they 2 have jointly agreed to modify the briefing schedule to give Plaintiffs a two-week extension to 3 file an opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended to May 27, 2011. In light of this 6 extension, the parties also respectfully request that Defendants be granted until June 3, 2011 to 7 file a reply brief, and that the Court thus reschedule the presently scheduled hearing on 8 dispositive motions to the next date convenient for the Court.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED: and the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be heard on Friday, July 8, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.